SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 25940

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MOHAMMED RAFEEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1953 OF 2026|CRIME NO.89/2026|CRMP NO.2 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ANN SUSAN GEORGE
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

Intermediate quantity NDPS offence with completed investigation warrants bail absent linking evidence.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act and Section 483 of BNSS, the accused was found in possession of 49.14 grams of substance alleged to be MDMA during a vehicle check. The court perused the case diary and chemical analysis report, finding the substance to be methamphetamine of intermediate quantity. The court determined no materials connected the accused to the crime and investigation was nearly complete. Second Paragraph: Key issue was whether continued detention was necessary given completed recovery and chemical report. Ratio: Absence of linking evidence and intermediate quantity do not justify prolonged custody. Third Paragraph: Application allowed; accused released on bail with conditions.

Table of Content
1. accused possessed intermediate quantity contraband under ndps act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. heard arguments; no evidence links accused to crime. (Para 4 , 5)
3. investigation complete; bail granted with conditions. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.89/2026 of Kasaragod Police Station, Kasaragod District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 22 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short, the NDPS Act).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 9.2.2026 at about 18.15 hours, at Vidyanagar in Kasaba village, the applicant was found in possession of 49.14 grams of MDMA in a car bearing Registration No. KL 14AE 0677 for its illicit sale in contravention of the NDPS Act and thereby committed the offence.

4. I have heard Smt. Ann Susan George, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. K.A. Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 9.2.2026. The investigation is almost over. The recovery has been effected. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the chemical analysis report shows that the contraband seized from the applicant is not MDMA but methamphetamine. Hence the quantity is intermediate. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top