IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
HUSSAIN THANGAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sureties appeal bail bond forfeiture penalties. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. forfeiture liability persists per precedent. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. penalty reduced to rs.15,000/- each with conditions. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 08th day of April, 2026
1st and 2nd sureties of accused No.1 and 2nd surety of accused No.8 in S.C.No.557/2013 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court – I, Thrissur, to whom against M.C.No.2178/2025 has been registered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thrissur, have filed this appeal under Section 495 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 .
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail and perused the order impugned.
3. Precisely stating, the appellant Nos.1 and 2 herein stood as sureties Nos.1 and 2 for accused No.1 and the 3rd appellant stood as 2nd surety for accused No.8 for releasing the accused on bail in this case before trial court and thereafter, due to non-appearance of the accused before the trial court, the bail bond executed by the appellants herein along with the accused has been forfeited and the trial court imposed penalty on the sureties which reads as under:
“6. In the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.