IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, BASANT BALAJI, JJ
THE IVERKALA MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.Q-119(D), APCOS, IVERKALA NADUVIL, IVERKALA EAST P.O., KOLLAM , REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY – Appellant
Versus
ASHISH V.G. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. declines intervention in ongoing interim matter (Para 2) |
| 2. grants liberty for urgent single judge hearing (Para 3) |
The impugned interim order was issued by the learned Single Judge on 16.02.2026 for a period of one month; subsequently to be extended for a period of two weeks on 16.03.2026 and by a further period of three months on 23.03.2026. We are told that the appellants have moved I.A.No.1/2026 before the learned Single Judge, invoking Article 226(3) of theConstitution of India.
2. Obviously, therefore, it would not be proper for us to intervene at this stage against an interim order which has been extended at least twice. It is for the appellants to pursue the above mentioned interim application filed, or to seek any other benefits as would be entitled to them under the statutory scheme.
3. Since the aforesaid I.A. is still stated to be pending, we leave liberty to the appellant to move the learned Single Judge appropriately for an urgent and early hearing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.