SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26030

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Gopinath P., J
C.K. Biju – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13957 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Vivek Menon, Shri.Rance R., Shri. N. RegHU Raj SR.
For the Respondents: Smt. Resmi Thomas (GP)

Court directs time-bound disposal of co-operative surcharge appeal with hearing and stays coercive recovery pending decision.

Headnote:Under Section 68 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, petitioners faced a surcharge order (Exhibit P2) by the Joint Registrar and appealed under Section 83(1)(e) (Exhibit P3) to the Principal Secretary. Court directed expeditious disposal. Court found undue delay in appeal consideration and limited relief appropriate. Issue framed as directing time-bound disposal of appeal with hearing opportunity. Ratio: Given limited relief sought and instructions from counsel, court mandates hearing and decision within three months, staying coercive action pending appeal outcome. Writ petition disposed directing 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P3 appeal within three months from certified copy receipt, after hearing parties, with abeyance of coercive proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P2.

Table of Content
1. surcharge order appealed under co-op act. (Para 1)
2. direct time-bound appeal disposal with stay. (Para 2 , 3)

JUDGMENT

Petitioners suffered Exhibit P2 order of surcharge in proceedings under Section 68 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The petitioners have preferred Exhibit P3 appeal before the 1st respondent under Section 83 (1)(e) of the Act . The petitioners are before this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 appeal, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

3. Having heard Sri. N. Raghuraj, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, on the instructions of Adv. Vivek Menon, and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents and also considering the limited nature of relief sought for by the petitioners, the writ petition will stand disposed of, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 (if the appeal is received and it is in order), after affording to the petitioners and any other affected parties an opportunity of being heard , within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Any coercive proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P2 shall be kept in abeyance till a decision is taken on Exhibit P3 appeal by the 1st respondent.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top