IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
GLOBAL RHYTHM LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M/S. VECTOR DIGITAL SERVICES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to jurisdiction-lacking interim injunction and transfer. (Para 1) |
| 2. balancing parties' rights with modified interim order. (Para 2) |
| 3. disposal with clarification pending district court orders. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The original petition has been filed stating that an interim order of injunction has been granted by a Court without jurisdiction. The Court which granted the order had jurisdiction at the time of filing the suit, since the notification whereby the jurisdiction was lost was issued only on 11.03.2026 and the suit had been filed on 10.03.2026. The interlocutory order was passed on 12.03.2026, by which time, the Court had lost its jurisdiction because of the notification. The Court was not aware of this fact since the notification was forwarded to the Court by High Court only on 17.03.2026. The plaintiffs can also not be found fault with since they moved a Court which had jurisdiction at the time of filing. After receiving notice, the respondents entered appearance and contested the interlocutory petition. The interlocutory petition was heard and taken for orders. Thereafter, the Court suo motu advanced the petition and transferred the case to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.