SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26259

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
PRADEEP KUMAR A. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12662 OF 2026



Important Points

Court directs internal review of suspension order pending enquiry instead of direct judicial interference.

Subject

Service Law - Disciplinary Proceedings

Headnote

The petitioner challenged an order of suspension issued by the employer corporation, asserting no valid grounds existed for such action. The court noted the suspension was pending an enquiry with charges already issued. The court directed the petitioner to seek review from the Managing Director rather than granting direct relief. The primary issue was the validity and review of the suspension order during pending disciplinary proceedings. The ratio decidendi emphasized that courts should not interfere directly but direct parties to internal review mechanisms where appropriate requests can be addressed expeditiously. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for the petitioner to file a review request within ten days, to be decided by the Managing Director within three weeks.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VISHNU BHUVANENDRAN
For the Respondents: SRI.T.NAVEEN, SC

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges suspension order lacking justification. (Para 2)
2. directs review request to managing director with timelines. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P2 order of suspension stating that there is absolutely no reason for keeping him under suspension.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation submits that pending enquiry, the petitioner was kept under suspension and memo of charges have already been issued on 30.03.2026.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the respondents to review the order of suspension, for which this Court is of the opinion that appropriate request in this regard shall be submitted by the petitioner before the Managing Director of the 1st respondent.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as follows:

(i) The petitioner shall file an appropriate request before the Managing Director of the 1st respondent seeking review of the order of suspension within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment and on receipt of the same, the Managing Director of the 1st respondent shall take appropriate decision on the same within a period of three weeks thereafter.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top