Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: KUM.NIHARIKA HEMA RAJ
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file fresh one.

Headnote:First Paragraph: No specific statutes analyzed as the petition was withdrawn. Petitioner, alleged to be a foreigner, filed writ challenging detention amid criminal proceedings (Crime No.739/2024). Court granted permission to withdraw without substantive findings. Second Paragraph: No issues framed or ratio decidendi established due to withdrawal. Third Paragraph: Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

Permission is granted. Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :