Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26572

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
RINEESHA AMEER – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 47248 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.A.ANOOP
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUSANTH SHAJI, SRI.V.V.SHAJI, SHRI.ALBIN A. JOSEPH, SMT.NEKHA VARGHESE

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's submission.

Headnote:First Paragraph: No specific statutes analyzed. Petitioner filed writ petition against bank, supported by loan repayment schedule and medical reports as exhibits. Court accepted submission that matter became infructuous. Second Paragraph: No formal issues framed. Ratio: Counsel's submission on infructuous nature accepted without further reasoning. Third Paragraph: Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. Submission accepted and this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26572

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JRINEESHA AMEER – AppellantVersusHDFC BANK LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER – RespondentWP(C) NO. 47248 OF 2025

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's submission.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
RINEESHA AMEER – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 47248 OF 2025