Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
INSHAD ISAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges magistrate's show-cause order lacking substance of information. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 7) |
| 2. bnss sections 126/129/130 mandate written order with information substance. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. prior cases affirm order invalid without stated grounds; mc allowed. (Para 8 , 9) |
Dated this the 6th day of April, 2026 ORDER The petitioner is the counter-petitioner in M.C.No.285/2025 pending before the Court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Palakkad (2nd respondent).
2. By Annexure-II order, the petitioner has been directed to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like sum for the purpose of keeping peace for a period of one year as envisaged underSection 126read with Sections 129 and 130 of theBNSS.
3. The petitioner contends that, Annexure-11 order is unsustainable in law because the Sub Divisional Magistrate has not set forth the substance of the information in the said order, which is mandatory under Section 126 read with Sections 129 and 130 of the BNSS , and the law laid down by this Court in Moidu vs. State of Kerala ( 1982 KHC 139 ).
Therefore, Annexure-A2 order may be quashed.
4. I have
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
