SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26756

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
Byju Mathew – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 259 OF 2022|WP(C) NO. 9133 OF 2023|WP(C) NO. 12037 OF 2023|WP(C) NO. 29606 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BINU PAUL, SRI.C.JOSEPH ANTONY, SRI.C.JOSEPH ANTONY, SRI.C.JOSEPH ANTONY, SHRI. JOHN MANJOORAN
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV, GP

Section 5A of Kerala Building Tax Act upheld as constitutional post-101st Amendment, per prior judgment.

Headnote:First Paragraph: The challenge pertains to Section 5A of the Kerala Building Tax Act following the 101st Constitutional Amendment, which introduced GST and impacted state taxing powers on buildings. Petitioners contested the validity of building tax assessments post-amendment, citing prior payments of luxury tax and property tax. The Court relied on its prior determination upholding the provision's constitutionality. Second Paragraph: The core issue framed is the constitutionality of Section 5A post-101st Amendment. The ratio decidendi rests on the binding precedent from W.P.

(C) No.2219 of 2023 dated 17.03.2026, where the Court upheld the State's authority to levy the tax. Last Paragraph: The writ petitions stand dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to section 5a constitutionality post-gst amendment. (Para 1)
2. prior judgment binding, upholding state's taxing power. (Para 2)

J U D G M E N T

[WP(C) Nos.259/2022, 9133/2023, 12037/2023, 29606/2021]

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking to challenge the constitutionality of Section 5A of the Kerala Building Tax Act , consequent to the 101st Amendment to the Constitution of India .

2. The above issue has already been considered by this Court and decided in favour of the State, by judgment dated 17.03.2026 in W.P.(C) No.2219 of 2023.

In such circumstances, I find no merit in these writ petitions, and the same would stand dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top