Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26780
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
N.T.DAVIS – Appellant
Versus
COCHIN PORT TRUST – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35264 OF 2015
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.),SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE,SRI.P.PRIJITH,SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA
For the Respondents: SRI.K.ANAND (SR.),SMT.LATHA ANAND, SC, COCHIN PORT TRUST
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.),SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE,SRI.P.PRIJITH,SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA
For the Respondents: SRI.K.ANAND (SR.),SMT.LATHA ANAND, SC, COCHIN PORT TRUST
Writ petition dismissed due to absence of petitioner's counsel.
Headnote:First Paragraph: The petition challenges promotion decisions under Recruitment, Seniority and Promotion Regulations, 2010 (Ext.P1), including orders dated 03/04/2013 (Ext.P2), 23/08/2013 (Ext.P3), and seniority list dated 01/08/2015 (Ext.P5). Petitioner submitted representation (Ext.P8) against exclusions. Court found counsel absent. Second Paragraph: No issues framed due to default. No ratio established. Last Paragraph: Writ Petition dismissed for default.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal for counsel's absence. (Para 1) |
JUDGMENT
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default.
