SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26798

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
BIJUKUMAR K. – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12528 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI, SMT.THAJUNA MARIA FRANCIS
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

Passport authorities must process date of birth correction applications promptly per law and prior judgments.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Passport Rules govern corrections of date of birth in passports issued to minors. Petitioner holds passport with erroneous date of birth (06.05.1961 instead of 30.05.1969), supported by SSLC, PAN, Aadhaar documents; applied for renewal with correction but process delayed despite appointment letter. Court finds administrative delay and directs processing with reference to prior judgment (Ext.P7). Second Paragraph: Issue framed as delay in correcting passport date of birth post-renewal application. Ratio: Authorities must process formal applications for corrections in accordance with law, noting prior court judgments on similar errors in minor-issued passports. Third Paragraph: Writ petition disposed directing petitioner to submit formal application within two weeks and 2nd respondent to decide within three weeks.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's passport has incorrect date of birth from minor issuance. (Para 1)
2. no formal correction application submitted yet. (Para 2)
3. direct submission and processing of correction application mandated. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the holder of an Indian passport.

According to the petitioner, his actual date of birth is 30.05.1969. However, the date of birth has been mistakenly shown in the passport as 06.05.1961. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted an application for renewal of passport with correction of date of birth. The petitioner states that the passport was issued to him when he was a minor. Pursuant to the application for renewal, Ext.P6 appointment letter was issued to the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that, so far, his application for correction of date of birth is not processed. Accordingly, the writ petition is filed for the following relief:-

“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or writ of similar nature or order or direction commanding the respondents to correct the date of birth of petitioner as 30-05-1969 and to re issue the passport with correct date of birth.”

2. The learned DSGI, on instructions, submits that Ext.P6 is only an appointment letter and the petitioner has not submitted formal application for correction of date of birth in the passport.

3. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the following direction :-

The petitioner shall submit an application for correction of date of birth in the passport pursuant to Ext.P6 before the 2nd respondent within a period of two weeks from today. Once such application is received, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, taking due note of Ext.P7 judgment of this Court, within a period of three weeks therefrom.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top