SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26884

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
SREENI PARAMESWARAN – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13459 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Smt.K.Krishna, Shri.Achyuth Menon, Smt.Parvathy Menon, Shri. V. Harisankar, Smt.Anna Anto
For the Respondents: Christopher Abraham, Additional Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department, Shri.P.R.Ajith Kumar

Court directs priority disposal of delay condonation and stays in tax appeals, suspending recovery proceedings.

Headnote:Under the Income Tax Act, the assessee filed appeals (Exts.P3, P4) with delay condonation and stay petitions (Exts.P5, P6) against assessment orders (Exts.P1, P2) for 2008-09 and 2011-12, amid recovery notice (Ext.P7). Court finds recovery proceedings premature pending appeals. Issues framed as directing expeditious disposal of delay and stay applications. Ratio: Appellate authority must prioritize delay condonation before stay and recovery matters. Writ petition disposed; 2nd respondent to condone delay within two months, decide stays within one month if condoned, and stay recovery until then.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's appeals and stay petitions against tax assessments pending recovery. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is an assessee under the Income Tax Act , has filed Ext.P3 appeal along with a delay petition, being aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order pertaining to the assessment year 2008–2009, and Ext.P4 appeal along with a delay petition, being aggrieved by Ext.P2 assessment order pertaining to the assessment year 2011–2012. Along with Exts.P3 and P4 appeals, Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions were also submitted. Ext. P7 is the revenue recovery notice.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the recovery proceedings being pursued by the respondents pending consideration of the appeals and the stay petitions. This writ petition is submitted in such circumstances. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 2ndrespondent shall take up the delay condonation applications at first and appropriate orders thereon shall be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. In the event of the delay being condoned, the 2ndrespondent shall take up Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions and appropriate orders in accordance with law, shall be passed after hearing the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of condonation of delay. Until such a decision is taken, the recovery proceedings pursuant to Ext.P7 shall be kept in abeyance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top