SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26888

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
M/S. STARK PHOTOBOOK – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, PATTOM RANGE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13590 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PADMANATHAN K.V., SRI.R.SREEJITH, SHRI.MOHAMMED SHINAF A.
For the Respondents: SHRI.V.GIRISHKUMAR, SC

Section 16(5) CGST Act's non-obstante clause overrides Section 16(4) time limit for ITC if returns filed by 30.11.2021.

Headnote:The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) governs input tax credit (ITC) claims under Sections 16(4) and 16(5). The taxpayer filed returns for January to March 2020 claiming ITC, but the authority denied it for late filing beyond Section 16(4) deadline. Court found returns filed on 07.11.2020, 09.11.2020, and 11.11.2020, within Section 16(5) cut-off of 30.11.2021. Section 16(5) non-obstante clause overrides Section 16(4), entitling taxpayer to ITC if otherwise eligible. Issue: Whether denial of ITC under Section 16(4) valid despite compliance with Section 16(5)? Ratio: Section 16(5) prevails over Section 16(4) via non-obstante clause; timely filing under Section 16(5) negates Section 16(4) time bar (paragraph 3). Writ petition allowed; Ext.P2 quashed; respondent directed to reconsider and grant Section 16(5) benefit.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a registered taxpayer under the provisions of theCGST Act. The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P2 order passed by the 1strespondent by which the Input Tax Credit claimed by the petitioner, for the months of January 2020 - March 2020 was declined on the reason that the petitioner failed to submit the returns within the statutory period contemplated under Section 16(4) of theCGST Act. 2. The challenge is raised by the petitioner mainly relying upon Section 16(5) of theCGST Act, which provides that, in case, the returns are submitted within the cut-off date contemplated therein, which is 30.11.2021, such taxpayer would be entitled to claim the Input Tax Credit. 3. In this case, on going through Ext.P2 order itself it can be seen that, the petitioner had submitted the returns pertaining to the period from January 2020 – March 2020 on 07.11.2020, 09.11.2020 and 11.11.2020 respectively. Thus, it is revealed that, the petitioner had submitted the returns within the cut-off date contemplated under Section 16(5) of theCGST Act. As far as Section 16(5) is concerned, the same contains a non obstante clause in respect of Section 16(4) of the Act, and therefore, once the taxpayer furnishes the return within the cut- off date contemplated therein, the time limit prescribed under Section 16(4) loses its significance. In such circumstances, an interference is required.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, quashing Ext.P2, with a direction to the 1st respondent to reconsider the matter and grant the benefit of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act to the petitioner, if it is otherwise entitled.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top