IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
RAMACHANDRA SHENOY – Appellant
Versus
VELLACHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. concurrent conviction under section 138 ni act challenged. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. amicus curiae appointed due to non-representation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. additional evidence opportunity adequately provided. (Para 6) |
| 4. dishonour memos valid; revision petition dismissed. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The concurrent verdicts of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Alathur, and the Sessions Court, Palakkad, in C.C.No.375/2011 & Crl.A.No.255/2014 respectively, convicting the petitioner for the commission of offence under Section 138 the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881(in short, ‘NI Act’) and sentencing him to imprisonment till rising of the Court with a further direction to pay compensation of Rs.8,50,000/- under Section 357 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(in short, ‘Cr.PC’) are under challenge in this revision petition.
2. The prosecution case relates to the dishonour of Ext P2 cheque dated 30.04.2014 for an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- issued by the petitioner to the complainant/first respondent, and the non-payment of the cheque amount despite the receipt of statutory notice. The Trial Court relied on the evidence tendered by the complainant as PW1 and the documents marked as Exts
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.