No interference in lower courts' order providing alternate accommodation in shared household dispute.

ORDER

Dated this the 8^th day of April, 2026 The petitioner in M.C.No.63/2021 on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjeri, filed this Crl.R.P. being aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.13/2025.

2. As per the above judgment, the learned Sessions Judge modified the order passed by the learned Magistrate in CMP No.619/2024. It appears that, as per the above order, the learned Magistrate has provided an alternate accommodation to the petitioner and directed her to vacate the shared household and to shift into the alternate accommodation provided. Aggrieved by the said order, she preferred the Crl.Appeal in which the learned Sessions Judge also confirmed the order of the learned Magistrate and directed the petitioner to vacate the shared house. Being aggrieved by the said order, she preferred this Crl.R.P.

3. At the time of arguments, it is revealed that the property in which the shared household situates now belong to respondents 2 & 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it was a sham document. Any way, the court below had already provided an alternate accommodation to the petitioner and it is also revealed that the 1^st respondent has been paying rent at the rate of Rs.18,000/- per month for the alternate accommodation provided. In the above circumstances, I do not find any grounds to interfere with the findings of the court below so as to call for any interference. In the result, this Crl.R.P. is dismissed.