Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
PRAKASHAN M.K – Appellant
Versus
PARAKKADAVU SERVICE COO-OPERATIVE BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 9004 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.K.VARGHESE, SHRI.M.T.SAMEER, SHRI.DHANESH V.MADHAVAN, SHRI.JERRY MATHEW, SMT.DEVIKA K.R., SMT.SAWPARNIKA RAJU, SHRI.BHARATH R.
For the Respondents: SRI.S.GOPINADHAN, SMT. SILPA N.P (GP)

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise contentions.

Headnote:No statutes analyzed as judgment involves procedural withdrawal. Petitioner sought dismissal of writ petition while reserving contentions. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty reserved. No issues framed. No ratio decidendi established due to withdrawal. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, leaving contentions open.

JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, leaving open all contentions raised by the petitioner.

In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the liberty as aforesaid.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMGOPINATH P., JPRAKASHAN M.K – AppellantVersusPARAKKADAVU SERVICE COO-OPERATIVE BANK – RespondentWP(C) NO. 9004 OF 2026

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise contentions.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
PRAKASHAN M.K – Appellant
Versus
PARAKKADAVU SERVICE COO-OPERATIVE BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 9004 OF 2026