IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.Abdul Hakhim, J
John Victor – Appellant
Versus
Chelساسin.V – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 677 OF 2024|WP(C) NO.19042 OF 2015
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent claims compliance; petitioner disputes fullness. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. case closed with liberty to challenge. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
1. The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent submitted that an Order is issued in compliance with the judgment dated 25.09.2023 in W.P.(C) No.19042/2015.
2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the said Order is not in full compliance with the aforesaid judgment and the Contempt Case can be closed, giving liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the same.
3. Giving such liberty, the Contempt Case is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.