Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.Abdul Hakhim, J
John Victor – Appellant
Versus
Chelساسin.V – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent claims compliance; petitioner disputes fullness. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. case closed with liberty to challenge. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
1. The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent submitted that an Order is issued in compliance with the judgment dated 25.09.2023 in W.P.(C) No.19042/2015.
2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the said Order is not in full compliance with the aforesaid judgment and the Contempt Case can be closed, giving liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the same.
3. Giving such liberty, the Contempt Case is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
