Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.Abdul Hakhim, J
Akash Sudhish – Appellant
Versus
National Housing Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks loan account closure direction. (Para 1) |
| 2. bank assures closure post demand draft encashment. (Para 2) |
| 3. petition disposed recording bank's submission. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
1.
The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the Respondent No.2 to process and close the Petitioner’s loan account with the Respondent No.2.
2.
The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.2, on instructions, submitted that the Bank has received an application for closure along with a Demand Draft for the outstanding amount, and on realization of the amount by encashment of the Demand Draft, the loan account will be closed within twenty working days.
3.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, recording the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.2.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
