SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27245

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
MARY STEFEENA.K.W. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13194 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SUNIL KUMAR (PALAKKAD), SRI.B.S.SURAJ KRISHNA
For the Respondents: SHRI.V.GIRISHKUMAR, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL, ADV.LEEMA ROSY.D, FOR R3

Passport for minor child post-divorce can be issued to custodial parent with Annexure-C affidavit without other parent's consent.

Headnote:Under the Passport Rules, 1980, Schedule III, Annexure-C clause (d) applies when parents are divorced with custody to one parent and visitation rights to the other, requiring consent from the parent with visitation rights or proof of denial. Petitioner, sole custodian post-divorce, applied for minor child's passport submitting affidavit but faced delay due to missing consent from ex-husband with visitation rights. Court directed production of custody order and processing without insisting on consent if affidavit complies. Issues framed around passport issuance to minor sans both parents' consent post-divorce. Ratio: Affidavit per Annexure-C suffices; prior ruling in analogous case held no dual consent needed if form followed. Writ petition disposed directing processing of application within one month upon submission of custody judgment.

Table of Content
1. divorced mother applies for minor's passport. (Para 1)
2. passport office requires father's consent despite custody. (Para 2 , 3)
3. prior ruling allows affidavit without dual consent. (Para 4)
4. court directs processing upon custody order submission. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

The marriage between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent was dissolved by Ext.P2 decree of divorce. The petitioner applied online for a passport for her minor son, as evidenced by Ext.P4 receipt. The petitioner states that along with the application for passport, she had also submitted an affidavit in Annexure-C. However, the application has not been processed by the 2nd respondent on the ground that she has not produced a No Objection Certificate from the 3rd respondent. Accordingly, the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider her application for issuance of a fresh passport to her minor child.

2. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, the 3rd respondent has entered appearance and submitted that he has been given visitorial rights on the child and that the conditions in Ext.P3 judgment are not being complied with by the petitioner.

3. A statement has been placed on record by the learned Senior Panel Counsel on behalf of the 2nd respondent. Paragraph Nos.3 to 5 of the said statement read as follows:

“ 3. It is further submitted that on scrutiny of the application submitted and the instant writ petition, it is understood that the parents of the minor applicant are legally divorced and the Hon.Family Court, Ernakulam has granted permanent custody to the mother, Mary Stefeena and visitation rights to the father, Micheal P.K. The applicable clause in annexure C, therefore, is (d) which reads as, “The parents are divorced/judicially separated and custody of the minor has been assigned to one parent (parent who is applying for the passport), with visitation rights to the other parent. (Supporting documents to be enclosed: Copy of court order/decree regarding divorce/judicial separation, consent of other parent (having visitation rights) is also required)

4. The application of the minor has been put on hold for father’s consent. The petitioner instead of furnishing the consent of the father proceeded to file the instant petition.

5. It is submitted that the petitioner either has to submit the consent of the father or valid proof that she had sought the consent of the father and he has denied it. Once any of these are submitted with the second respondent (R2), remedial measures in issuance of passport to the minor shall be initiated as the child’s right to have a passport and travel abroad cannot be denied.”

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to produce Ext.P3 judgment before the 2nd respondent for consideration of the application for issuance of passport to the minor child. The learned counsel refers to the decision of this Court in Chaitanya C.Nair (Minor) v. Union of India & Ors. [2022(3) KLT 520], wherein it has been held that if an affidavit is filed in the form of Annexure-C of Schedule III of the Passport Rules, 1980 , the passport issuing authority can issue a passport to a minor child without insisting upon the consent of both parents.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions :

(i) The petitioner shall produce a copy of Ext.P3 judgment before the 2nd respondent.

(ii) The 2nd respondent shall process the application of the petitioner in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top