IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
M/S. VEENUS PLY BOARDS – Appellant
Versus
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. orders under sections 7q, 14b challenged via pending appeals. (Para 1) |
| 2. debate on appeal maintainability for section 7q interest. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. stay on damages recovery; interest payable in instalments. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT The petitioner suffered orders under Section 7Q and Section
14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (in short ‘the 1952 Act’). Both these orders are on record as Ext.P2 in the writ petition. The petitioner has preferred appeals against both these orders and those appeals are stated to be pending before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ernakulam (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’). In the meanwhile, recovery proceedings were initiated to recover the amounts due under the orders referred to above, prompting the petitioner to approach this Court by filing the above writ petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Department would submit that no appeal lies against an order demanding interest under Section 7Q of the 1952 Act. It is submitted that in so far as the order imposing damages under Section 14B of the 1952 Act is concerned, an appeal can be maintain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.