SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27379

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
JUSNA C K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7760 OF 2026



Important Points

Mandamus directing expeditious finalization of disciplinary suspension proceedings post-hearing.

Subject

Service Law - Disciplinary Proceedings

Headnote

Petitioners, healthcare workers, suspended based on sessions court judgment in criminal case (Ext.P6), issued show-cause notices (Exts.P7, P8), submitted replies (Exts.P9-P12); grievance is delay in finalizing proceedings. No specific statutes quoted. Court notes compliance with sessions court order and petitioners' replies filed. Issues framed as need for timely finalization post-hearing. Ratio: Proceedings must be concluded expeditiously after opportunity of hearing, considering replies. Writ petition disposed directing 2nd respondent to finalise within two months.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SREEJITH S. NAIR, SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR (SR.), SRI.SATHEESH MOHANAN, SMT.MAHIMA
For the Respondents: SRI.VENUGOPAL V., GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.M. AJAY, STANDING COUNSEL

Dated this the 7th day of April, 2026 JUDGMENT Based on the observations made in Ext.P6 judgment in SC No.472 of 2021, the petitioners have been kept under suspension as per Exts.P7 and P8, whereby an explanation was sought for by the 2nd respondent. The petitioners submitted Exts.P9 to P12 reply to the said Show-cause Notice. The specific grievance raised by the petitioners is that the proceedings have not been finalised yet.

2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

2nd respondent submits that the Show-cause Notice was issued strictly in compliance with Ext.P6 judgment of the Sessions Court.

Since the objections have already been filed by the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to finalise the proceedings initiated pursuant to Exts.P7 and P8, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and taking into consideration Exts.P9 to P12 reply submitted by the petitioners. A decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top