IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Ziyad Rahman A.A., J
Sreedharan Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessee appealed rejected assessment order. (Para 1) |
| 2. writ dismissed; statutory remedies available. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is an assessee under the provisions of the Income Tax Act pertaining to the year 2010-2011. As against Ext.P2 assessment order, the petitioner submitted an appeal before the 1st Appellate Authority. Now as per Ext.P3, the said appeal has been rejected, by confirming the order of assessment.
2. This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner challenging Ext.P2 assessment order and Ext.P3 appellate order. Even though the learned counsel for the petitioner raised various contentions including that Ext.P2 order of assessment is barred by limitation, I am of the view that since the petitioner had already invoked the statutory remedy of appeal against the said assessment order, it is not necessary for this Court to entertain this writ petition at this juncture. Petitioner is having an alternate and effective remedy as against Ext.P3 by submitting an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal as well.
In such circumstances, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to invoke the statutory remedies available, this writ petition is dismiss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.