SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
J. Nisha Banu, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ
Shine Das – Appellant
Versus
Deepthi – Respondent
MAT.APPEAL NO. 170 OF 2020|OP NO.36 OF 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN, SHRI.K.SUJAI SATHIAN, SMT.ASHA MARIAM MATHEWS
For the Respondents: SMT.KEERTHI M., SHRI.ARJUN RAJA P.C.

Divorce granted by High Court based on parties' mediated settlement agreement under Section 89 CPC.

Headnote:The appeal challenges a Family Court judgment dismissing a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The marriage was solemnised on 13/06/2012 with two children born. Parties reached a settlement via Memorandum of Settlement Agreement dated 16/09/2025, providing Rs.18,00,000/- to wife and child maintenance per prior order. Court found the settlement lawful and inclined to grant divorce. Issue framed: whether to allow divorce based on settlement under Section 89 CPC read with mediation rules. Ratio: Court perused the Memorandum and Mediator's report, confirming consensus; marriage stands dissolved as parties abide by terms including payment schedule and no further claims. Appeal disposed of; marriage solemnised on 13/06/2012 dissolved; Memorandum forms part of judgment.

Table of Content
1. parties directed to mediation and reached consensus. (Para 3 , 4)
2. court approves settlement; grants divorce by consent. (Para 5 , 6)

This appeal is filed by the husband challenging the judgment dated 16/12/2019 passed by the Family Court, Ottapalam, in O.P. No.36/2018, in a petition for divorce filed by him under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The respondent herein is his wife.

2. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 13/06/2012 in accordance with the Hindu rites and ceremonies.

Two children were born out of this wedlock.

3. Earlier on 20/08/2025, both parties appeared before this Court, and this Court directed them for mediation on the same day itself.

4. On 06/04/2026, when this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the respondents submitted that the parties had reached at consensus and settled their disputes as per the Memorandum of Settlement Agreement dated 16/09/2025 executed by them and countersigned by their respective counsel before the Ernakulam Mediation Centre, High Court of Kerala. We, therefore, adjourned the matter to today for the report of the Mediator.

5. The Memorandum of Settlement is placed before this Court along with the report of the Mediator. We have perused the Memorandum of Settlement Agreement and have found the same to be in accordance with law. The parties are to abide by the Memorandum of Settlement Agreement.

6. In view of the settlement arrived at by the parties and recording the Memorandum of Settlement Agreement, we are inclined to grant divorce to the parties. The marriage solemnised on 13/06/2012 will stand dissolved. This appeal is disposed of. The Memorandum of Settlement Agreement dated 16/09/2025 shall form part of this judgment. No order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top