SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30952

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
GOPALAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.), SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR, SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner was the licensee of Toddy Shop No.22/2007-08 (Cheruthony) of Idukki Excise Range. A copy of the licence is Ext.P1. By Ext.P2, licence was again granted for the year 2008- 09 and thereafter it was again granted for 2009-2010. According to the petitioner, he is one of the accused in Crime No.7/2008 registered by Idukki Excise Range and the case is pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Idukki. It is stated that, the Investigating Officer has submitted the final report but the committal proceedings have not been completed and charge as provided under Section 211 Cr.P.C has not been framed against him. In the circumstances, petitioner submits that, in view of Exts.P4 and P5 judgments of this Court, he cannot be denied preference under Rule 5(1)(a) of the Abkari Shops Disposal Rules 2002 nor can be excluded from participating in the auction for the conduct of the toddy shops.

:2 :

2. Learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner, contended that neither under Rule 5(1)(a) nor under Rule 5(3)(i) of the Abkari Shops Disposal Rules 2002 can a person be excluded from allotment of Toddy Shops for the reason that he is an accused in a case involving offences

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top