SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 47905

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J
PUSHPARAJAN V., – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (ROADS), – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN, SMT.A.C.VIDHYA, SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN

J U D G M E N T

The prayers in the above Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows:

“1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order directing the respondents 2 and 4 not to make any drainage construction encroaching into the property covered by Ext.P-1 and P-2 without resorting to land acquisition proceedings.

2. Declare that the destruction caused in Ext.P-5 without land acquisition proceedings is illegal.

3. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order directing the respondents 2 and 4 to pay compensation to the petitioner for the damage caused in Ext.P-9 or direct them to rectify the entire damages by reconstructing the damaged portions.

4. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order directing the 1st respondent to take disciplinary action against the 2nd respondent and to black list the 4th respondent for the illegal acts committed in this case and to impose fine and to deduct the same from his bills.

5. Issue such other order or directions which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

6. Award cost of this litigation.”

2. Heard Sri.A.Rajasimhan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt.A.C.Vidhya, learned Govt. Pleader appearing fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top