SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 45622

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V.K.MOHANAN, J
RAMAKRISHNAN.K.R. – Appellant
Versus
REGHA & ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.), SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN, SRI.UNNI SEBASTIAN KAPPEN

J U D G M E N T

The appellant herein is the complainant in C.M.P.No.717 of 2009 of the court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thrissur. By the impugned order dated 10.3.2011, the learned Judge of the Special court has found that the appellant/complainant is liable to be prosecuted for the offence under Section 211 of IPC and thus ordered to file a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate court-Thrissur for prosecuting the appellant for the offence under of . It is the above order which is under challenge in this appeal.

2. Heard the counsel for the appellant. I have also perused the order impugned in this appeal.

3. As I indicated earlier, the order challenged in this appeal is an order issued under Section 340 of Cr.P.C., by which the learned Judge of the Special court has found that the appellant herein is liable to be prosecuted for the offence under Section 211 of IPC and also observed that the complaint will be filed before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate-Thrissur for prosecuting the complainant/ appellant for the offence punishable under of . V.C.No.13 of 2009/T.S.R. was registered on the basis of a private complaint preferred by one Wilson rep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top