SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34251

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J
ABY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD, REP. BY ITS – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.JOSE THOMAS (PALA)

JUDGMENT

Heard the counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner is the defendant in O.S.101/07 on the file of the Sub Court, Pala instituted by the first respondent/bank for recovery of money. The suit was decreed ex parte as the petitioner as also the other defendants in the suit did not appear when the suit stood posted for trial in the special list. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application to set aside the ex parte decree and the court below vide Ext.P6 order impugned in this Writ Petition, allowed the said application on payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- to the first respondent and producing receipt within ten days.

3. To order the defendant who seeks to get the ex parte decree set aside, to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- within a period of ten days tantamounts to disallowing the petition filed under Order IX Rule 13 as a person who is a debtor in the normal course will not be able to raise such a huge amount of Rs.10,000/- within ten days and to pay by way of cost to the first respondent/plaintiff. The cost so ordered is highly disproportionate and unconscionable and Ext.P6 order to that extent cannot be sustained.

4. In the result, even without notice to the respondent/decree

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top