HIGH COURT OF KERALA
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J
RATHEESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioner is the accused in crime No.542/2016 of Thiruvalla Police Station, registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323 and 308 r/w Section 34 IPC. 2. The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C
3. The prosecution allegation is that on 23.02.2016 at 9.45 a.m., the petitioner and the other accused attacked the de-facto complainant causing injuries on him. The 1st accused hit on the de-facto complainant with an iron block and the other accused attacked the de-facto complainant with hands.
4. Heard.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor has no serious objection in allowing this application. It appears from the wound certificate produced by the learned Public Prosecutor that the de-facto complainant sustained only very trivial injuries in the incident. The other accused persons have been already granted the relief under Section 438 Cr.PC, submitted at the bar. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary for the progress of investigation of this case. In the said circumstances, an order under Cr.PC will be justified in this case.
6. In the result, this bail
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.