SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39231

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J
RATHEESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in crime No.542/2016 of Thiruvalla Police Station, registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323 and 308 r/w Section 34 IPC. 2. The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C

3. The prosecution allegation is that on 23.02.2016 at 9.45 a.m., the petitioner and the other accused attacked the de-facto complainant causing injuries on him. The 1st accused hit on the de-facto complainant with an iron block and the other accused attacked the de-facto complainant with hands.

4. Heard.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor has no serious objection in allowing this application. It appears from the wound certificate produced by the learned Public Prosecutor that the de-facto complainant sustained only very trivial injuries in the incident. The other accused persons have been already granted the relief under Section 438 Cr.PC, submitted at the bar. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary for the progress of investigation of this case. In the said circumstances, an order under Cr.PC will be justified in this case.

6. In the result, this bail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top