HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K VINOD CHANDRAN, T. R. Ravi, JJ
NOORUL HUDA MAHALLU JAMA ATH,REP.BY – Appellant
Versus
P.M.SAIDALAVI.OTHERS – Respondent
ORDER
T.R.Ravi, J.
Heard Sri K.P.Majeed, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, Sri T.C.Suresh Menon, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent, Sri P.Chandrasekhar, learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent and Sri T.K.Saidalikutty, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent Board.
2. The revision petitioner filed W.O.S.No.63 of 2007, before the Wakf Tribunal, Ernakulam, praying for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents 1 and 2, their wives, men and agents from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing any waste therein, and, from causing any obstruction or hindrance to the measuring out the plaint schedule property with the aid of the officials of the survey department. The property scheduled to the plaint is an extent of 71.460 cents in survey numbers 469/1,6 and 470/2,3 of Palakkad district. According to the plaintiff, they had purchased 57.250 cents by virtue of various sale deeds by raising funds from its members and beneficiaries and got another extent of
14.210 cents by way of Wakf.
3. The petitioner claims absolute title over the plaint schedule property and also claims that the entire extent as wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.