SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12798

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
B.KEMAL PASHA, J
MUHAMMED SACHIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY SRI.ANIL GEORGE

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Petitioners are A20 and A21 in CC No.17/2012 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Nedumangad, for the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 447 and 427 read with Section 149 IPC . The allegation is that as a part of a strike of the students of an engineering college, some students, who are identifiable on sight, trespassed into the college compound and damaged and destroyed the window shields of the college buses and also damaged some window panes, notice boards, etc. of the college.

Crl.M.C.1616/2017

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the de facto complainant has not been cooperating with the trial and he himself is absconding. This Court has issued notice to the de facto complainant, who is impleaded as additional 3rd respondent. The notice issued to him has returned as unclaimed.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, due to the pendency of the present criminal case, the petitioners are not in a position to secure a proper job. It has been pointed out that there is no evidence at all against the petitioners.

4. The court below shall take note of the aforesaid facts and see that the trial is comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top