SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 7705

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.BASANT, M.C.HARI RANI, JJ
T.P.SUDHEESH BABU – Appellant
Versus
SHERLY.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.K.V.SOHAN, SMT.SREEJA SOHAN, SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE

JUDGMENT

Basant,J.

Are the provisions of Sec.24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 applicable when the proceedings before the Family Court is under Sec.12 of the Hindu Marriage Act for declaration of nullity of marriage? This is the short question of law which is canvassed before us.

2. The vital facts first. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised on 13/5/05. The spouses lived together for some time; but thereafter started separate residence. The petitioner filed O.P.No.148/06 under Sec.12 of the Hindu Marriage Act for a declaration that his marriage with the respondent is null and void. During the pendency of that petition, the respondent filed I.A.No.628/06 under Sec.24 of the Hindu Marriage Act claiming monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs.10,000/-.

3. The said application was resisted. The learned Judge of the Family Court by Ext.P3 order directed the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.2,000/- per mensem as interim maintenance and to pay an amount of Rs.3,500/- as litigation expenses. That order was not promptly challenged; but was sought to be reviewed by filing I.A.No.956/07. The learned Judge by Ext.P4 order tur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top