SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 5628

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V.GIRI, J
N.M.ABOOBACKER – Appellant
Versus
MECHERI ALAVI – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON, Sri.BABU S. NAIR, Smt.M.K.PUSHPALATHA

O R D E R

The complainant in C.C.No.260/00 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kottayam, is the petitioner herein.

2. The complaint was originally filed under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 {for short 'the Act'}, alleging that the cheque issued by the accused in discharge of a liability was dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds and that therefore, the accused has committed the offence under Section 138 of the Act.

3. Finding that no notice was served on the accused, the court below declined to take cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Act, but nevertheless took cognizance under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code . It is now stated, across the Bar, that the complainant had preferred a revision against the order of the trial court declining to take cognizance of the offence under of the Act, before the concerned Sessions Court. The details of the same are not available. Therefore, I do not propose to express any opinion as regards the said contention or on the said aspect.

4. After having taken cognizance of the offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code , the case was taken on file, though originally it was transferred to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top