SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 19642

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
ATHUL CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl./1438/2016



Advocates:
SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.

Young age and absence of prior offenses can justify bail, especially where allegations are based on oral testimony and no injury occurred.

Headnote:

Bail - Crime - IPC Sections 323, 341, 353, 308, 34 - The court allowed bail to the petitioners, considering their young age, lack of prior offenses, and reliance on the oral testimony of the complainant without solid evidence of injury.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners are accused in a criminal case for offenses under IPC sections involving assault on a police officer during an inquiry, where no physical injury was sustained by the officer.

Finding of the Court:

The court determined that custodial interrogation of the petitioners could be avoided due to their young age and the lack of substantial evidence of injury, allowing bail.

Issues: Whether the petitioners should be granted bail given the allegations against them and their young age.

Ratio Decidendi: The decision emphasized the significance of age and absence of prior offenses in favor of bail in cases where the allegations rely primarily on oral testimony without corroborative evidence of injury.

Final Decision: Bail granted to the petitioners with conditions.

O R D E R

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No. 114/2016 of Perambra Police Station for offences punishable under Sections

323, 341, 353, 308 read with Section 34 IPC .

2. According to the defacto complainant, who is the A.S.I.

of Police attached to the Perambra Police Station, on 14.02.2015 at 7.30 p.m., he had gone to the locality in connection with an enquriy in a complaint. While he was enquiring from the 1st petitioner herein, the other petitioners intervened. It appears that, he was not in uniform but he disclosed his identity. Thereafter it is alleged that the accused abused him and the 1st accused caught hold of the dress of the Police Officer, which was torn. The 2nd accused allegedly took a granite piece and attempted to hit against the head of the defacto complainant. He moved to one side, hence he did not sustain injury. Contenting that had he not moved to one side he would have sustained fatal injuries, complaint was laid. The petitioners apprehending arrest, seek bail.

3. It appears that, the petitioners had intervened in the official functioning of a Police Officer. It appears that, he had disclosed his identity also. Though there is an allegation constituting offence under Section 308 , no injury has been caused to the Police Officer. The petitioners are in the age group of 18 to

19 years. They are not seen involved in any other case.

Having regard to the young age of the petitioners and further that the allegation of the defacto complainant is essentially a matter depending on the oral testimony of the defacto complainant, I feel that, custodial interrogation of the petitioners can be avoided. Hence the bail application is allowed as follows:

(i) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigation Officer within 10 days from today and shall undergo interrogation. Thereafter if they are proposed to be arrested, they shall be released on bail, on each of the petitioner executing a bond for a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each.

(ii) They shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Saturdays between

9.00 a.m. and 10.00 a.m. for a period of two months from the date of execution of the bond as above.

(iii) They shall not threaten the defacto complainant, coerce or intimidate the witnesses and shall not in any manner interfere with the investigation.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top