SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30697

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, J
VINOD @ APPU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.K.I.SAGEER

O R D E R

1.Application for regular Bail preferred by accused No.3 in Crime No 642/2016 of Ernakulam Central Police Station.

2.The crime referred above has been registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 120 (b), 341, 323, 324, 326, 307 r/w 34 of the IPC . He seeks his enlargement on bail in the aforesaid crime.

3.Prosecution allegation is that on 22.03.2016 at 9.30 pm, the petitioner, along with the other accused, in furtherance of their common intention, wrongfully restrained the defacto complainant and thereafter, the 1st and 2nd accused voluntarily caused hurt to him on various parts of his body with iron rods. Specific overt acts are also alleged against the petitioner herein.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

5.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.03.2016. It is further submitted that in connection with the same transaction, some injuries were sustained by the petitioner as well.

6.I take note of the fact that the petitioner is undergoing incarceration since 27.03.2016. The Investigation has proceeded much and it app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top