O R D E R

The petitioners, who are the respondents in the complaint filed by the 2nd respondent before the Additional Judicial First Class Magisrate -I, Hosdrug have approached this court seeking exercise of the inherent jurisdiction of this court to quash Annexure A1 complaint and all further proceedings in C.C.No.51 of 2014 initiated pursuant to the complaint .

2. Heard Sri. Mahesh V.Ramakrishnan, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Smt. M.K. Pushpalatha, the learned Public Prosecutor and Sri Aneesh Joseph, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.

3. The case of the 2nd respondent in the complaint is that he had purchased 2 Acres of land as per document No.1559/2012 dated 29.06.2012 from the petitioners 1 to 5 with the intention to start a farm house along with his wife. Then he approached a Bank for financial assistance by mortgaging his property. But the bank refused to grant financial assistance sought for by him and then only he realised that the document executed by the petitioners 1 to 5 in his favour was with an intention to cheat him and actually the property sold to him was not covered by document No.1769/67 of S.R.O Hosdrug, claimed as the prior title deed of the