SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33406

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.BASANT, J
ARFATH BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
MR.M.I.SHAJI & OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the defacto complainant in Crime No.210 of 2006 of Chittoor Police Station. She had raised allegations against 5 accused persons, of which the 1st accused is her husband. Accused 2 to 5 are relatives of her husband. She had in fact raised the allegations in a private complaint filed by her before the learned Judicial First Class of the Magistrate, Chittur. That was referred to the police by the learned Magistrate. After investigation, the police had submitted a final report. In the final report, the police had reported that no offence is revealed against accused 2 to 5. Allegations were raised against the 1st accused under Section 498 A I.P.C. The learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offence alleged against the 1st accused and registered a case against the 1st accused only.

2. The short grievance raised by the petitioner in this case is that she is entitled to be heard before such a negative final report in so far as it relates to accused 2 to 5 arrayed by her in the complaint is accepted. Acceptance of the final report without and before giving notice to her to raise her objections amounts to negation of her rights to seek justice from the Court. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top