IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
J. NISHA BANU, SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JJ
TRUSTINE GEORGE JACOB – Appellant
Versus
ANU SUSAN SAM – Respondent
MAT.APPEAL NO. 872 OF 2014|MAT.APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2014|MAT.APPEAL NO. 15 OF 2015
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of lower court matrimonial judgments appealed. (Para 1) |
| 2. settlement renders appeals infructuous. (Para 2 , 3) |
Mat. Appeal No. 872 of 2014 has been filed by the husband challenging the common judgment dated 04.07.2014 in O.P. No. 614 of 2012 on the file of the Family Court, Muvattupuzha, by which the original petition filed by the wife for return of money and gold ornaments was allowed in part, Mat. Appeal No. 874 of 2014 has also been filed by the husband challenging the judgment dated 04.07.2014 in O.P.No.616 of 2012 filed by the husband for decree for restitution of conjugal right, which was dismissed. Mat. Appeal No. 15 of 2015 has been filed by the wife challenging the judgment dated 04.07.2014 in O.P. No. 615 of 2012 on the file of the Family Court, Muvattupuzha, whereby her original petition seeking a decree of divorce was dismissed.
2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the wife.
3. Today, when the case was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the wife submitted that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled out of court. It is further submitted that the wife has remarried, and a petition for divorce by mutual consent had already been filed in the year 2016. An endorsement to that effect has also been made by the learned counsel for the wife.
Considering the aforesaid submission, we find that nothing survives for consideration in these matters.
Accordingly, these Matrimonial Appeals are disposed of as settled.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.