SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37492

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J
JOHNCY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM SRI.D.KISHORE

J U D G M E N T

Heard Sri.Liji J Vadakedom, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Anu Sivaraman, the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioner who was working as Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Peerumade in Idukki District, was placed under suspension by Ext.P2 order dated 29.4.2009 issued by the District Collector, Idukki on the ground that he was arrested in connection with a criminal case and remand to judicial custody. Aggrieved by the order of suspension, the petitioner has filed Ext.P3 representation dated 6.7.2009 before the Land Revenue Commissioner. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to Land Revenue Commissioner to consider Ext.P3 representation and pass orders thereon, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court.

3. Ext.P2 order of suspension was issued on

29.4.2009. Under Rule 22 of the Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules , 1960 an appeal lies therefrom the next higher authority. Under Rule 25 of the said Rules, the period of the limitation prescribed for filing an appeal is two months from the date on which the order of suspension is served on the employee. Ext.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top