SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43016

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.ANIL KUMAR, J
SHIBU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR

ORDER

2. By judgment dated 30.04.2004, the learned magistrate convicted and sentenced accused 1 and 2 to undergo simple imprisonment for one year each for the offence punishable under Section 324 r/w Section 34 of the IPC and for the offence punishable under Section 326 of the , to undergo simple imprisonment for two years each and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months more each. Challenging the conviction and sentence, the 1 st accused preferred an appeal before the appellate court. By judgment dated 11.03.2010, the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court. Being aggrieved, the revision petitioner/1 st accused is before this Court.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 13.12.1997 at about 7.30 pm, at the road in front of the shop of PW5, accused 1 and 2, in furtherance of their common intention, voluntarily caused hurt to PWs 1 to 3 and grievous hurt to PW4 by beating with MO1 series firewood and thereby committed the offences punishable under Sections 324 and 326 r/w Section 34 of the IPC .

4. During the trial of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top