SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 59855

EZHUTHACHAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR – Respondent


Advocates:
S.EASWARAN, SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN (IRIMPANAM), SRI.M.A.AUGUSTINE, SRI.P.SREEKUMAR (THOTTAKKATTUKARA), SMT.SOUMYA JAMES, SMT.P.A.MENISHA,SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY,SRI.E.R.ANIL (A

J U D G M E N T

The prayers in the above Writ Petition

(Civil) are as follows:

“a) issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writs, directions or orders calling for the records leading upto Exhibit P7 order and quashing Exhibit P7 order;

b) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, directions or orders restraining the 2nd respondent from representing the Ezhuthachan Educational Society, 322/92 Thrissur;

c) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, directions or orders restraining the 1st respondent from further proceeding with Ext.P7 order, pending disposal of the writ petition.

d) to grant such other reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. Heard Sri.S.Easwaran, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for 1st respondent and Sri.Dinesh R.Shenoy, learned counsel appearing for contesting respondents 2 & 3. ::3::

3. The core of the factual elements required for the short disposal of this case are as follows:

From the pleadings and materials on record, it is seen that internecine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top