SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 48172

PONNAMBILATH ABDUL SALAM,(PARTY-IN-PERSO – Appellant
Versus
CHOTTUKADAN KUNHAMINA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

O.S. No. 242 of 2001, a suit for realization of an amount of Rs. 3,15,000/-with interest advanced by the plaintiff to the defendant pursuant to an agreement dated 20.8.1999, was dismissed by the Additional Subordinate Court, Thalassery by a judgment dated 20th June, 2003. Challenging the said verdict, this appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff against the defendant/respondent.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties to this appeal are referred to, as the plaintiff and the defendant, as arrayed in the suit before the trial court.

3. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are as follows:

On 20.8.1999 the defendant agreed to sell her property for a total sale consideration of Rs.8,55,000/- to the plaintiff within a period of 4 ½ months from the date of agreement. On the date of the agreement plaintiff had advanced a sum of Rs.3,15,000/- to the defendant. Though, the plaintiff was ready with the balance sale consideration, on enquiry, it was learnt that the property was mortgaged with Kerala Financial Corporation ('KFC' for short) and some other Banks. So also, it was learnt that the the defendant had ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top