SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37598

MANIKANDAN.R – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
T.MADHU

O R D E R

The petitioner is the 1st accused in Cr.No.362/2018 of Rajapuram Police Station, Kasaragod district, which has been registered for offences punishable under Secs.354, 363, 376 r/w

Sec.34 of the IPC and Sec.3(a) r/w Secs.4, 7, 8, 16 & 17 of the POCSO Act.

2. The brief of the prosecution case is that the petitioner

(A1) on 28.10.2018 at about 1.45 pm had taken the minor victim girl aged 16 years with the held of accused No.2 and without the consent of a lawful guardian from Panathur, the place where victim girl and A1 are residing, in a car to Kanhangad and thereafter brought her to Puthukotte in Tamil Nadu and further that the victim girl had stated that on 29.10.2018, after medication she was in a drowsy mood and had felt that somebody had lying over her body.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would point out that the victim has not made any allegations either in her FIS or subsequent statements that the first accused or any other accused had sexual intercourse with her and that therefore the incorporation of the offences u/s 376 of the IPC and Sec. 3 & 4 of the POCSO Act, relating to penetrative sexual assault is not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top