J U D G M E N T

The Review Petition is filed by the writ petitioner on certain grounds. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, going by Annexure-V Judgment rendered in a similar case, a Division Bench of this Court has recognised the award of one more mark, for the student therein, based on the revaluation. It is therefore, submitted that the situation herein is identical as the petitioner has also obtained one more mark consequent on the revaluation. If the said mark is reckoned, the petitioner who is now doing the M.B.A course will be able to pursue his studies. Reliance is placed on the decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C).No.33172/2003 and that of the Apex Court in Selin Mary Mammen v. Mahatma Gandhi University and Others [ (2008) 17 SCC 615 ] to support the plea that if the person fell short by only one mark in the qualifying examination, direction can be issued to reckon the said mark for enabling the party concerned to pursue the course to which he has joined, based on the marks of the qualifying examination.

2. The writ petition, W.P.(C). No.35142/2009, was disposed of by Judgment dated 05/03/2010, directing the Vice Chancellor to take a d