SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15885

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHGJI P. CHALY, J
ANAGHA G NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL DIERECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Petitioner and her team participated in the Malappuram District School Kalotsavam, 2016-17 in the event 'Koodiyattom'. However, the team could secure 2nd place in the competition, and being aggrieved, petitioner has preferred an appeal before the Appellate Committee constituted for the purpose and suffered with Ext.P3 order. It is thus challenging Ext.P3, and seeking other associated reliefs, this writ petition is filed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and perused the documents on record and the pleadings put forth by the petitioner.

3. Even though a copy of the appeal memorandum is not produced along with the writ petition, the grievance voiced by the petitioner is discernible from Ext.P3 to the effect that the sound system was not proper, and there was bodily ailments to the main actor.

4. To the said grievance voiced, the appellate committee, in its order, stated that the stage manager has not reported any shortcomings with respect to the sound system, and further that there is considerable difference of 16 marks by and between the 1st rank holder and the petitioner.

5. Taking note of the respective submissions and reasons assig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top