SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 32352

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.BASANT, M.C.HARI RANI, JJ
VASANTHAKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
OMANAKUTTAN NAIR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

BASANT, J.

In a transfer for consideration in the name of 2 persons where such consideration is paid exclusively from the separate fund of one of them, is Section 45 or the salutary rule of equity underlying Section 45 of the Transfer of Property Act applicable ? This is the short question that arises for consideration. To be more specific, the question is whether Section 45 or the principle therein can apply when the consideration is paid “out of exclusive funds of one of them” and not “out of separate funds belonging to them respectively”?

2. This Appeal is filed by the wife whose petition for declaration that she is the absolute owner of the property purchased under Ext.A3 and for consequential relief was dismissed by the Family Court. She was found to be having only half rights in the property.

3. On fundamental facts, there is no serious dispute. The property in question was acquired under Ext.A3 sale deed for consideration. The marriage between the spouses took place on 25.01.1986. The sale deed Ext.A3 in their favour was obtained on 26.10.1988. In the document, in page 3, there is an unambiguous recital about consideration which on translation reads roughly as follows:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top