SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 46616

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J
N MOHANAN – Appellant
Versus
THE ASST EXCISE COMMISSIONERENFORCEMENTALAPPUZHA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This writ petition, once again, brings into focus the issue of the distance-norm in establishing retail liquor outlets. To be precise, the issue is how the distance between a liquor outlet and an educational institution with many access points to be reckoned.

2. The petitioners are the licencees of Toddy Shop Nos.91 to

95 in Group No.17 of Cherthala Excise Range. Shop No.93 is the subject of the present lis. The shop was set up in a particular building till 2007, when it was shifted to another location with the leave of the authorities. The record reveals that shifting was occasioned because the landlord wanted to sell his property. Soon thereafter, in view of the difficulties the licencees faced with the new landlord, they once again applied to the authorities to shift the shop WPC 14159/15 2 to a new location. They did obtain the permission but could not shift the shop, given the public protest in the proposed area.

3. As the petitioners could not shift the toddy shop to the newly permitted location, they negotiated with the owner of the building in which they had their shop till 2007 and secured his consent to move back, for he had decided to retain the property instead of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top