SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44630

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J
SAINULABDEEN – Appellant
Versus
AGRICULTURAL OFFICER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is stated to be in ownership and possession of 6 Ares and 7 Square Links of property in Re.Sy.No.281/9-4 and Re.Sy.No.281/9-1 of Nellanadu Village in Nedumangadu Village, Thiruvananthapuram, is aggrieved by Ext.P6 order of the respondent Panchayath, whereby a building permit, that was granted to him, was subsequently cancelled by the Panchayath, on the ground that the land on which the building was constructed, was classified as 'Nilam' in the revenue records.

2. When the writ petition came up for admission, this Court called for a report from the additional 6th respondent, who is the Convener of the Local Level Monitoring Committee [LLMC], with regard to the lie and nature of the property and specifying whether the property in question was included in the draft/notified data bank. A report has since been filed by the additional 6th respondent, which indicates that, based on the Satellite image of the plot taken on various dates, the property in question was filled and converted in 2003 itself and there is no agricultural activities from 2003. It is suggested that the land belonging to the petitioner cannot be included in the land data bank for the purpos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top