SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 41706

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH, J
MOHANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


ORDER

This criminal revision petition is moved by the petitioner herein challenging the concurrent finding of guilt. The accused in C.C.No.39/99 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Thrissur is the petitioner. He was tried and convicted for the offence under Section 409 of IPC and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and also ordered to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- with default simple imprisonment for six months. The appeal preferred by him was also not unsuccessful. Hence this revision petition.

2. When the criminal revision petition came up hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that revision petitioner is a extra departmental delivery agent in postal department. The allegation is that he had misappropriated the amounts entrusted to deliver money order. The incident occurred in the year 1997.

After hearing the learned counsel, I perused the records and evidence available in this case. It can be seen that there is nothing to interfere with the conviction entered into by the courts below as there was no illegality or perversity committed by the courts below.

3. A report of the Probation Officer was seen called by thi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top