SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 23443

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J
K FAIZEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The petitioner had purchased a Water well/Piling Rig from Misana in the State of Gujarat. He has obtained a No Objection Certificate dated 30.07.2010 from the Road Transport Officer, Gujarat, for re-registration of the vehicle before the Regional Transport Officer, Ernakulam. He had also submitted an application on 30.06.2011 for being issued with necessary permit to use his vehicle. He had purchased the Rig by availing a loan from the State Bank of Travancore, Kaloor, Ernakulam. Therefore according to him, the delay in granting registration to his Rig is causing a lot of difficulties and hardships to him.

2. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that a proper application for registration of the petitioner's Rig had not been received by the 3rd respondent. Therefore, the petitioner was directed to submit a fresh application. It is submitted by the petitioner that a fresh application has thereafter been submitted. He has produced Ext.P7 cash receipt for remitting the necessary fee on his application. The learned Government Pleader assures that the petitioner's application would be considered and necessary orders passed thereon within a short time.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top